Call me engineer

There has been a growing debate in the aviation industry about whether those who maintain and repair airplanes in the U.S. should be called aircraft mechanics or aircraft engineers. While the term "aircraft mechanic" has been the standard terminology in the U.S. for many years, some argue that the term "aircraft engineer" is more accurate and reflective of the skill and expertise required for this profession

In the United States, aircraft mechanics are those who maintain and repair airplanes rather than aircraft engineers. While this may seem like a semantic difference, there are several reasons why the term "aircraft mechanic" is used in the US and is not interchangeable with the term "aircraft engineer."

One of the primary reasons why the term "aircraft mechanic" is used in the US is due to legal and regulatory requirements. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has specific regulations and requirements for those who work on airplanes, including qualifications and certifications for aircraft mechanics.

To become an aircraft mechanic in the US, individuals must complete a formal training program, gain experience working on aircraft, and pass a series of exams and practical assessments. The FAA also requires that aircraft mechanics hold a valid Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) certificate, demonstrating their knowledge and competency in aircraft maintenance.


The use of the term "aircraft mechanic" in the US accurately reflects the qualifications and responsibilities of those individuals who meet the FAA's requirements and regulations.

Additionally, supporters of the term "aircraft engineer" point out that many other countries, such as the UK and Canada, use this terminology to describe those who work on airplanes. In an article for Aviation Week, former UK Chief Scientific Adviser Sir David King states that "the term 'aircraft engineer' is the one used in the UK and other parts of the world to describe someone who maintains and repairs aircraft. It is a better description of the skills and knowledge needed for the job."

Professional and Educational Standards:

Another reason why the term "aircraft mechanic" is used in the US is due to the professional and educational standards for those who work on airplanes. In the US, aircraft mechanics are not required to hold a university degree or engineering qualification, unlike in other countries where they may be referred to as aircraft engineers.

While a degree in engineering or a related field may benefit those working on airplanes, it is not a requirement in the US. Instead, the FAA's certification process ensures that aircraft mechanics have the necessary knowledge and skills to perform their duties safely and effectively.

Supporters of using the term "aircraft engineer" argue that the work performed by those who maintain and repair airplanes is complex and requires high technical knowledge and expertise. In an article for the Seattle Times, aviation writer Dominic Gates notes that "aircraft maintenance has evolved into an engineering discipline that requires a higher level of skill and technical expertise than in the past."




Industry Terminology:

Finally, the use of the term "aircraft mechanic" in the US is also a reflection of industry terminology and everyday usage. The term "mechanic" is often used to describe those who work with machinery and mechanical systems, which accurately reflects the nature of the work performed by aircraft mechanics.

While the term "engineer" may be used in some other countries to describe those who work on airplanes, the term "aircraft mechanic" in the US has become the standard term used by industry and regulatory bodies.

Critics of using the term "aircraft engineer" in the US, however, argue that the term is misleading and could create confusion about the qualifications required for this profession. In an interview with NBC News, Sarah MacLeod, executive director of the Aeronautical Repair Station Association, stated that "the term 'engineer' has a specific meaning in the US, and those who maintain and repair aircraft do not meet the qualifications to be called engineers."

MacLeod's point is supported by the fact that in the US, the term "engineer" is typically reserved for those who hold a university degree in engineering or a related field and who are licensed by state boards. This distinction is recognized by the National Society of Professional Engineers, which states on its website that "engineering licensure is a legal and professional designation that demonstrates an individual has met certain educational, experience, and examination requirements to become an engineer."

In conclusion, while there is a growing debate about using the term "aircraft engineer" to describe those who maintain and repair airplanes in the US, both sides have valid arguments. Supporters of the term argue that it reflects the high level of technical skill and expertise required for this profession. In contrast, critics say that it could create confusion about the qualifications required for the job. Ultimately, the use of terminology in this industry will likely continue to evolve and adapt to changing standards and practices.

Want more information? Learn more or request a detailed analytical report on the data in this article by visiting Consulting by Cota or listen to episode 18 of the cotacast as I discuss this topic. listen for free on Spotify, anchor, or apple podcast on the cotacast homepage.

Previous
Previous

demanding trouble

Next
Next

faa ata shortage & virgin orbit bankrupt